• Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to content

e-Learning Professor

by Graham Stewart on 22 April 2016 Leave a Comment

E-Textbooks – Reading on a screen

hipster_02_transpIt’s getting on for a quarter of a century since the New York Times Book Review announced “The End of Books”. Computer screens had started to allure readers with a new nonlinear or nonsequential space that offered not only the words on a page, but the promise of information rich hyperlinked pathways into new knowledge. Today, although printed books haven’t yet disappeared, the widespread use of e-books, and especially e-textbooks in higher education is overwhelming. It is undeniable that the adoption of the e-textbook brings with it all the advantages of interactivity, animations, simulations and instant online quizzes to test your progress. But it is also true that e-textbooks are popular because they are cheap, not necessarily for the individual student, but certainly for the distributors.

Back in the nineteen nineties, Sven Birkerts challenged the notion of e-books and even questioned the possibility of maintaining coherent thought while reading on a screen (I recommend the chapter entitled “Hypertext: Of Mouse and Man” in Birkerts’ 1994 book The Gutenberg Elegies). Kolb presents a similar argument in “Socrates in the Labyrinth” (1994). Birkerts’ reservations have particular resonance now in an increasingly digital learning environment. We need to be critical of the e-textbooks we prescribe to our students, and even more so if we venture into authoring them ourselves. Are we sufficiently aware of the requirements of on-screen reading? Does the design of the learning material we recommend provide a sufficiently logical framework to our users? Are we providing an abundance of information but very little clarity?

I hope that the readings provided below provoke a debate that will ultimately benefit our students. At the very least we should be in a position to scrutinise our burgeoning e-textbook collections with a more discerning eye.

Birkerts, S. 1994. The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. Faber and Faber.

Birkerts, S. 2012. Why Read? School Library Journal, 58 (3): 26.

Kolb, D. 1994. Socrates in the Labyrinth. In: Landow, G. P. ed. Hyper/Text/Theory. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 323-344.

Kolb, D. 2008. The revenge of the page. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1379112: ACM, 89-96. Available: http://www.dkolb.org/fp002.kolb.pdf (Accessed 12 November 2015).

Rainie, L., et.al. 2012. The Rise of E-Reading. Pew Internet & American Life Project:  Available: http://libraries.pewinternet.org/2012/04/04/the-rise-of-e-reading/  (Accessed 15 August 2015).

Stoop, J., Kreutzer, P. and Kircz, J. 2013. Reading and learning from screens versus print: a study in changing habits: Part 1 – reading long information rich texts. New Library World, 114 (7/8): 284-300.

Filed Under: Digital Scholarship, Innovative Pedagogy, Mobile Devices, Open Educational Resources (OER)

by Graham Stewart on 21 April 2016 Leave a Comment

African Storybook Delight

African_Storybook_transpLorato Trok certainly won over her audience at Durban University of Technology last year when she called for new participants in the African Storybook Project. The DUT Writing Centre have now added a new category for children’s stories in their annual writing competition. Budding authors are invited to write their own stories, or stories from the rich African oral tradition, or stories about experiences, hopes and fears of today’s African children. Anyone can try their hand, though. Go to http://www.africanstorybook.org/

Filed Under: General, Innovative Pedagogy, Open Educational Resources (OER)

by Graham Stewart on 23 March 2015 Leave a Comment

OERs and academics’ IP

Textbooks-Online1Kundayi Masanzu’s Mail and Guardian opinion piece  “Academics lose out to online study” raises a crucial question as lecturers prepare to move their modules online: “Moocs have opened up the floodgates of knowledge dissemination and, at the same time, exposed the importance of clarifying knowledge ownership within tertiary institutions.” What is the fairest balance between the sharing of learning content, and commercial publication? Prof Caroline Ncube of UCT provides a helpful response to the question.

Filed Under: General, MOOCs, Open Educational Resources (OER)

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 10
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Comments

  • *gita on Value of taking learning online
  • Mari Pete on BEd in the Vanguard
  • Rosh Sunder on Flipping classrooms
  • Rosh Sunder on Flipping classrooms
  • *gita on Flipping classrooms

Categories

  • Digital Scholarship
  • E-Learning Conferences
  • Flipped Lecture Room
  • General
  • Innovative Pedagogy
  • International Education
  • Mobile Devices
  • MOOCs
  • Open Educational Resources (OER)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Copyright © 2025 · Breakthrough Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Accept